• Best Personal Injury Lawyers in Indiana

    Top Personal Injury Lawyers in Indiana Are Ready to Answer Your Questions. Ask Best Personal Injury Attorneys in Indiana, About Your Cases.

    Visit us :- https://www.handelonthelaw.com/united-states/indiana/personal-injury
    Best Personal Injury Lawyers in Indiana Top Personal Injury Lawyers in Indiana Are Ready to Answer Your Questions. Ask Best Personal Injury Attorneys in Indiana, About Your Cases. Visit us :- https://www.handelonthelaw.com/united-states/indiana/personal-injury
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 83 Ansichten 0 Bewertungen
  • Best Estate Planning Attorney Irvine California

    Ask Abbas Gokal, Top Estate Planning Law Lawyer in Irvine, California. Best Estate Planning Law Attorney Abbas Gokal in Irvine, California Offers Estate Planning Law Services.

    Visit us :- https://www.handelonthelaw.com/united-states/california/irvine/attorney/abbas-gokal
    Best Estate Planning Attorney Irvine California Ask Abbas Gokal, Top Estate Planning Law Lawyer in Irvine, California. Best Estate Planning Law Attorney Abbas Gokal in Irvine, California Offers Estate Planning Law Services. Visit us :- https://www.handelonthelaw.com/united-states/california/irvine/attorney/abbas-gokal
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 121 Ansichten 0 Bewertungen
  • Best Civil and Human Rights Attorneys in the USA

    Best Civil And Human Rights Lawyers in United States. Find Contact Information for the Right Civil And Human Rights Lawyers at Handel On The LAW, Attorney Directory.

    Visit us :- https://www.handelonthelaw.com/united-states/civil-and-human-rights
    Best Civil and Human Rights Attorneys in the USA Best Civil And Human Rights Lawyers in United States. Find Contact Information for the Right Civil And Human Rights Lawyers at Handel On The LAW, Attorney Directory. Visit us :- https://www.handelonthelaw.com/united-states/civil-and-human-rights
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 117 Ansichten 0 Bewertungen
  • How, Many, More…………….

    On Tuesday official jury selection began in the trial of Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer facing second-degree murder and manslaughter charges in the death of George Floyd. This case is now in the hands of the jury.

    The jury found Chauvin, 45, guilty of all three charges — second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. He could face up to 40 years in prison for second-degree murder, up to 25 years for third-degree murder, and up to 10 years for second-degree manslaughter.

    “What was going through Derek Chauvin’s mind when he kneeled on a handcuffed, prone George Floyd for nine minutes and 29 seconds?”
    That key question was at the heart of the three charges against the former Minneapolis Police officer and was top of mind for jurors in their deliberations. To render a verdict, they also had to interpret Minneapolis Police policies, Floyd’s cause of death, and the specific language of the law.

    The lawyer for Derek Chauvin argued on Monday that the former officer had acted reasonably when he knelt on George Floyd for more than nine minutes, imploring jurors to also consider the moments before officers took Mr. Floyd to the ground as they begin to debate whether to convict or acquit Mr. Chauvin.
    The names of the jurors are not known. But we do know that the jury was significantly less white than Hennepin County itself. The 12 jurors included four Black people, two people who identify as multiracial and six white people. Two alternates — both of them white women — were dismissed. Jury reported each day for duty to the Hennepin County Government Center under intense security measures, using a private entrance to enter the court. The jurors were given a laptop and monitor to review the extensive video footage and exhibits presented during the trial.

    “Use your common sense. Believe your eyes. What you saw, you saw,” prosecutor Schleicher told the jury.
    If the state is “missing any one single element” to meet the burden of proving Chauvin’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for each of the three counts, “it is a not-guilty verdict,” defense attorney Nelson told them.
    How, Many, More……………. On Tuesday official jury selection began in the trial of Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer facing second-degree murder and manslaughter charges in the death of George Floyd. This case is now in the hands of the jury. The jury found Chauvin, 45, guilty of all three charges — second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. He could face up to 40 years in prison for second-degree murder, up to 25 years for third-degree murder, and up to 10 years for second-degree manslaughter. “What was going through Derek Chauvin’s mind when he kneeled on a handcuffed, prone George Floyd for nine minutes and 29 seconds?” That key question was at the heart of the three charges against the former Minneapolis Police officer and was top of mind for jurors in their deliberations. To render a verdict, they also had to interpret Minneapolis Police policies, Floyd’s cause of death, and the specific language of the law. The lawyer for Derek Chauvin argued on Monday that the former officer had acted reasonably when he knelt on George Floyd for more than nine minutes, imploring jurors to also consider the moments before officers took Mr. Floyd to the ground as they begin to debate whether to convict or acquit Mr. Chauvin. The names of the jurors are not known. But we do know that the jury was significantly less white than Hennepin County itself. The 12 jurors included four Black people, two people who identify as multiracial and six white people. Two alternates — both of them white women — were dismissed. Jury reported each day for duty to the Hennepin County Government Center under intense security measures, using a private entrance to enter the court. The jurors were given a laptop and monitor to review the extensive video footage and exhibits presented during the trial. “Use your common sense. Believe your eyes. What you saw, you saw,” prosecutor Schleicher told the jury. If the state is “missing any one single element” to meet the burden of proving Chauvin’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for each of the three counts, “it is a not-guilty verdict,” defense attorney Nelson told them.
    Love
    1
    0 Kommentare 0 Geteilt 26 Ansichten 0 Bewertungen
Whatson Plus https://whatson.plus